holding the mere presence of asbestos in an office building does not constitute a direct physical loss
Summary of this case from In re Chinese Manufactured Drywall Products Liability Litigation90-35654.
January 31, 1992.
D.Or.
AFFIRMED
holding the mere presence of asbestos in an office building does not constitute a direct physical loss
Summary of this case from In re Chinese Manufactured Drywall Products Liability Litigationaffirming district court's holding that contamination of property was an economic loss rather than a physical loss given "the building remained physically unchanged"
Summary of this case from Accents of Sterling, Inc. v. Ohio Sec. Ins. Co.affirming dismissal of action on grounds of sovereign immunity where plaintiff alleged that Postal Service failed to note delivery date on a certified mail receipt and failed to obtain signatures from mail addressee and postal agent for certified mail receipt
Summary of this case from Zangari v. U.S. Postal Serv.Full title:Great Northern Ins. Co. v. Benjamin Franklin Federal Sav. Loan Ass'n
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Date published: Jan 31, 1992
The relatively small number of state appellate courts and federal district courts to have considered the…
Port Authority of New York & New Jersey v. Affiliated FM InsuranceLamentably, there is no controlling case on this point, and thus the Court must look to various persuasive…