From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Great Am. Ins. Co. v. Inland Mech. Servs.

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 3, 2024
5:23-cv-01390-DSF-SHK (C.D. Cal. May. 3, 2024)

Opinion

5:23-cv-01390-DSF-SHK

05-03-2024

GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY Plaintiff(s), v. INLAND MECHANICAL SERVICES, INC., et al. Defendant(s).


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

DALE S. FISCHER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 21 days after service or 60 days if the defendant is the United States. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(a)(1).

In this case, Inland Mechanical Services, Inc., Leonel Trujillo, Diana Trujillo, Francisco Silva, and Virginia Silva failed to plead or otherwise defend within the relevant time. The Court orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before May 17, 2024 why the claims against the non-appearing defendant(s) should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Failure to respond to this Order may result in sanctions, including dismissal for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Great Am. Ins. Co. v. Inland Mech. Servs.

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 3, 2024
5:23-cv-01390-DSF-SHK (C.D. Cal. May. 3, 2024)
Case details for

Great Am. Ins. Co. v. Inland Mech. Servs.

Case Details

Full title:GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY Plaintiff(s), v. INLAND MECHANICAL…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: May 3, 2024

Citations

5:23-cv-01390-DSF-SHK (C.D. Cal. May. 3, 2024)