From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gray v. Wal-Mart Stores Tex.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Dec 11, 2020
Case No. 3:19-cv-1255-K-BT (N.D. Tex. Dec. 11, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 3:19-cv-1255-K-BT

12-11-2020

TIANNA GRAY, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES TEXAS, LLC, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court has under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford dated November 6, 2020. The Court has reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED.

Signed December 11, 2020.

/s/_________

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Gray v. Wal-Mart Stores Tex.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Dec 11, 2020
Case No. 3:19-cv-1255-K-BT (N.D. Tex. Dec. 11, 2020)
Case details for

Gray v. Wal-Mart Stores Tex.

Case Details

Full title:TIANNA GRAY, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES TEXAS, LLC, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Dec 11, 2020

Citations

Case No. 3:19-cv-1255-K-BT (N.D. Tex. Dec. 11, 2020)

Citing Cases

Bradley v. Target Corp.

As discussed in Austin, Bradley's pleading is concerned with a condition on the premises rather than an…