From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gray v. Tri-State Consumer Ins. Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 31, 2018
157 A.D.3d 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

2016–08129 Index No. 705510/13

01-31-2018

Michelle GRAY, respondent, v. TRI–STATE CONSUMER INSURANCE COMPANY, appellant.

Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck LLP, Woodbury, N.Y. (Eric B. Stern of counsel), for appellant. Greenblatt & Agulnick, P.C., Great Neck, N.Y. (Scott E. Agulnick and Steven A. Kotchek of counsel), for respondent.


Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck LLP, Woodbury, N.Y. (Eric B. Stern of counsel), for appellant.

Greenblatt & Agulnick, P.C., Great Neck, N.Y. (Scott E. Agulnick and Steven A. Kotchek of counsel), for respondent.

L. PRISCILLA HALL, J.P., SYLVIA O. HINDS–RADIX, JOSEPH J. MALTESE, ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of a homeowner's insurance policy, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Gavrin, J.), entered July 28, 2016, which granted the plaintiff's motion to strike its answer based upon its alleged failure to comply with a conditional order entered December 16, 2015.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements, in light of our determination of the companion appeal (see Gray v Tri–State Consumer Ins. Co., ––– AD3d –––– [Appellate Division Docket No. 2015–12445; decided herewith] ).

HALL, J.P., HINDS–RADIX, MALTESE and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gray v. Tri-State Consumer Ins. Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 31, 2018
157 A.D.3d 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

Gray v. Tri-State Consumer Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Michelle GRAY, respondent, v. TRI–STATE CONSUMER INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 31, 2018

Citations

157 A.D.3d 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
157 A.D.3d 941
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 547