From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gray v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Mar 7, 2000
13 S.W.3d 669 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED 75940.

FILED: March 7, 2000.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, TIMOTHY J. WILSON, JUDGE.

Nancy L. Vincent, Public Defender's Office, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Stacy L. Anderson, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before: GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., PAUL J. SIMON, J., and JAMES R. DOWD, J.



ORDER


This is an appeal from a judgment denying a Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court's judgment is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Gray v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Mar 7, 2000
13 S.W.3d 669 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Gray v. State

Case Details

Full title:JULIE GRAY, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Mar 7, 2000

Citations

13 S.W.3d 669 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)