From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gray v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Dec 1, 2009
No. 05-08-01070-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 1, 2009)

Opinion

No. 05-08-01070-CR

Opinion issued December 1, 2009. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex. R. App. P. 47

On Appeal from the 15th Judicial District Court, Grayson County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 056361-15.

Before Justices BRIDGES, LANG, and LANG-MIERS.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Amber Wassom Gray appeals from her conviction for indecency with a child. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 21.11(a)(1) (Vernon 2003). On appeal, appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of her right to file a pro se response, but she did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.


Summaries of

Gray v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Dec 1, 2009
No. 05-08-01070-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 1, 2009)
Case details for

Gray v. State

Case Details

Full title:AMBER WASSOM GRAY, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Dec 1, 2009

Citations

No. 05-08-01070-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 1, 2009)