From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gray v. Sigler

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jun 3, 1976
532 F.2d 1008 (5th Cir. 1976)

Opinion

No. 76-1379. Summary Calendar.

Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

June 3, 1976.

John A. Gray, pro se.

John W. Stokes, U.S. Atty., Richard A. Horder, Asst. U.S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, GEWIN and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.



We have reviewed the record and find the appeal to be without merit. The right to a federal parole revocation hearing does not accrue while the parolee is serving an intervening federal sentence and the parole violator warrant remains unexecuted. Trimmings v. Henderson, 5 Cir., 1974, 498 F.2d 86, cert. denied, 420 U.S. 931, 95 S.Ct. 1135, 43 L.Ed.2d 405; Burnett v. United States Board of Parole, 5 Cir., 1974, 491 F.2d 966; Cook v. United States Attorney General, 5 Cir., 1974, 488 F.2d 667, cert. denied, 419 U.S. 846, 95 S.Ct. 81, 42 L.Ed.2d 75; Landman v. Carlson, 5 Cir., 1972, 463 F.2d 218, cert. denied, 410 U.S. 985, 93 S.Ct. 1512, 36 L.Ed.2d 182; Galloway v. Attorney General, 5 Cir., 1971, 451 F.2d 357; Cox v. Feldkamp, 5 Cir., 1971, 438 F.2d 1; Smith v. Blackwell, 5 Cir., 1966, 367 F.2d 539. Petitioner previously and unsuccessfully raised the same issue in a separate action, Gray v. Hogan, N.D.Ga., 1974, 388 F. Supp. 476, from which no appeal was taken.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Gray v. Sigler

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jun 3, 1976
532 F.2d 1008 (5th Cir. 1976)
Case details for

Gray v. Sigler

Case Details

Full title:JOHN A. GRAY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MAURICE H. SIGLER, CHAIRMAN, UNITED…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Jun 3, 1976

Citations

532 F.2d 1008 (5th Cir. 1976)

Citing Cases

In re Q.J.M.

Moreover, "[d]eductions are matters of legislative grace; taxpayers have no inherent right to them."…

Morris v. Morris (In re Q. J. M.)

Moreover, "[d]eductions are matters of legislative grace; taxpayers have no inherent right to them."…