From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gray v. Sandoval

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Jun 23, 2014
NO. 33,348 (N.M. Ct. App. Jun. 23, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 33,348 c/w NO. 33,670

06-23-2014

STACIE MARIE GRAY f/k/a, STACIE MARIE SANDOVAL, n/k/a STACIE MARIE IVEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARTIN CHRISTOPHER SANDOVAL, Defendant-Appellee.

Stacie Marie Gray Fort Collins, CO Pro Se Appellant Leslie Becker Albuquerque, NM for Appellee


This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY
Elizabeth E. Whitefield, District Judge
Stacie Marie Gray
Fort Collins, CO
Pro Se Appellant Leslie Becker
Albuquerque, NM
for Appellee

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ZAMORA, Judge.

{1} Appellant Stacie Marie Ivey [RP 300] (Mother) appeals pro se from the district court's October 4, 2013, minute order [RP 370] and the February 17, 2014, final minute order [Ct.App.File, blue tab] that address matters relating to child support, travel expenses, and attorney fees. Our second calendar notice proposed to affirm. {2}

Mother did not file a second memorandum in opposition to the second notice. Instead, Mother initiated a second appeal and filed a docketing statement in this Court in Ct.App.No. 33,670 (Case #2), where she appeals from the same district court orders at issue in this case. Because Mother is appealing from the same orders in both this case and in Case #2, we HEREBY CONSOLIDATE the appeals under this case, Ct.App.No. 33,348. {3} As for the merits of Mother's arguments, for the same reasons extensively discussed in our second calendar notice, we affirm. Mother did not file a memorandum in opposition to our second notice and we are not persuaded by her arguments. We therefore affirm.

{4} IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/_________

M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge

WE CONCUR:

/s/_________
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Chief Judge
/s/_________
TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge


Summaries of

Gray v. Sandoval

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Jun 23, 2014
NO. 33,348 (N.M. Ct. App. Jun. 23, 2014)
Case details for

Gray v. Sandoval

Case Details

Full title:STACIE MARIE GRAY f/k/a, STACIE MARIE SANDOVAL, n/k/a STACIE MARIE IVEY…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Jun 23, 2014

Citations

NO. 33,348 (N.M. Ct. App. Jun. 23, 2014)