From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gray v. Khoo

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 20, 2022
1:20-cv-01047-DAD-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2022)

Opinion

1:20-cv-01047-DAD-SAB (PC)

04-20-2022

DANA GRAY, Plaintiff, v. A. KHOO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR NOTIFICATION OF ANY DEPOSITIONS CONDUCTED BY DEFENDANTS

(ECF No. 81)

Plaintiff Dana Gray is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

Currently before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for notification of any depositions conducted by Defendants, filed April 18, 2022. Plaintiff requests to receive notification of any depositions conducted by Defendants and requests they be conducted by video in order to allow her to appear. (ECF No. 81.)

Plaintiff is advised that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30, requires that a “party who wants to depose a person by oral questions must give reasonable written notice to every other party.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 30(b)(1). However, the Court cannot and will not dictate the manner in which the deposition is conducted. Accordingly, Plaintiff's request that Defendants conduct any and all deposition by video is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gray v. Khoo

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 20, 2022
1:20-cv-01047-DAD-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2022)
Case details for

Gray v. Khoo

Case Details

Full title:DANA GRAY, Plaintiff, v. A. KHOO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Apr 20, 2022

Citations

1:20-cv-01047-DAD-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2022)