From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gray v. Khoo

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 20, 2022
1:20-cv-01047-DAD-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2022)

Opinion

1:20-cv-01047-DAD-SAB (PC)

04-20-2022

DANA GRAY, Plaintiff, v. A. KHOO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TRIAL PROCEDURES AS PREMATURE

(ECF No. 84)

Plaintiff Dana Gray is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

Currently before the Court is Plaintiff's motion regarding the trial procedures, filed April 18, 2022. Plaintiff requests information regarding witness fees and whether a trial will be held virtually. Plaintiff's request is premature as this case is not set for trial. In addition, if the case does proceed to trial the Court will at that time advise Plaintiff on the proper procedures and/or applicable witness fees. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion regarding the trial procedures is denied as premature.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 1


Summaries of

Gray v. Khoo

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 20, 2022
1:20-cv-01047-DAD-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2022)
Case details for

Gray v. Khoo

Case Details

Full title:DANA GRAY, Plaintiff, v. A. KHOO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Apr 20, 2022

Citations

1:20-cv-01047-DAD-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2022)