From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gray v. Gilmore

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 30, 2019
Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-01414 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 30, 2019)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-01414

08-30-2019

HEATH W. GRAY, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT GILMORE, MICHAEL ZAKEN and STEPHEN DURCO, Defendants.


Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan ECF No. 28 MEMORANDUM ORDER

Plaintiff initiated this civil rights action by filing a Motion for Leave to proceed in forma pauperis on October 23, 2018. (ECF No. 1). Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss and, in response, Plaintiff requested leave to file an Amended Complaint. On January 18, 2019, the Court granted leave and the Amended Complaint was filed. (ECF No. 26). The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1), and Local Rules of Court 72.C and 72.D.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 37), filed on June 20, 2019, recommended that the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 28) filed by Defendants Robert Gilmore, Michael Zaken, and Stephen Durco, be denied. Service was made on Plaintiff via first class mail to his address of record. The parties were informed that in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), and Rule 72.D.2 of the Local Rules of Court, that they had fourteen (14) days to file any objections, and that unregistered ECF users were given an additional three (3) days pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(d). No objections have been filed.

After review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following Order is entered:

AND NOW, this 30th day of August, 2019,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 28) filed by Defendants Robert Gilmore, Michael Zaken, and Stephen Durco, is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 37) of Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated June 20, 2019, is adopted as the Opinion of the Court.

BY THE COURT:

s/ J. Nicholas Ranjan

J. Nicholas Ranjan

United States District Judge cc: Heath W. Gray

FP 0237

175 Progress Drive

Waynesburg, PA 15370

Via U.S. First Class Mail

All counsel of record

Via electronic filing


Summaries of

Gray v. Gilmore

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 30, 2019
Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-01414 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 30, 2019)
Case details for

Gray v. Gilmore

Case Details

Full title:HEATH W. GRAY, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT GILMORE, MICHAEL ZAKEN and STEPHEN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 30, 2019

Citations

Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-01414 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 30, 2019)

Citing Cases

Tagliaferro v. Green

Without further allegations that the video recording was used for an improper purpose, Plaintiff has failed…