From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gray v. Daniels

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Jan 27, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv912-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Jan. 27, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv912-MHT (WO)

01-27-2016

KYM GRAY, Petitioner, v. LEEPOSEY DANIELS, et al., Respondents.


JUDGMENT

After an independent and de novo review of the record, it is ORDERED that:

(1) The petitioner's "Opposition to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge" (doc. No. 7) is treated as a motion for voluntary dismissal under Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and said motion is granted.

(2) The magistrate judge's recommendation (doc. no. 4) is withdrawn.
(3) The petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (doc. no. 1) is dismissed without prejudice.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

This case is closed.

DONE, this the 27th day of January, 2016.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Gray v. Daniels

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Jan 27, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv912-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Jan. 27, 2016)
Case details for

Gray v. Daniels

Case Details

Full title:KYM GRAY, Petitioner, v. LEEPOSEY DANIELS, et al., Respondents.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 27, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv912-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Jan. 27, 2016)