From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gray v. Cnty. of L. A.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 18, 2022
2:21-cv-07685-DMG-AFM (C.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-07685-DMG-AFM

01-18-2022

Kenneth Gray v. County of Los Angeles, et al.


CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

HONORABLE ALEXANDER F. MACKINNON, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Proceedings (In Chambers): Order to Show Cause

On December 6, 2021, the Court dismissed plaintiff's Complaint with leave to amend (“Order”) and advised plaintiff that if he desired to pursue the action he may file a First Amended Complaint remedying the pleading deficiencies discussed in the Order by January 5, 2022. (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff was admonished that if he failed to timely file a First Amended Complaint, the Court would recommend that the action be dismissed without leave to amend and with prejudice on the grounds set forth in the Order and for failure to prosecute. The docket shows that, as late as the date of this Order, plaintiff has not filed a First Amended Complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that within 20 days from the filing date of this Order, plaintiff shall show cause in writing why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The filing of a First Amended Complaint within 20 days shall discharge the Order to Show Cause.

Further, plaintiff is admonished that if he fails to timely file a First Amended Complaint remedying the pleading deficiencies, the Court will recommend that this action be dismissed without leave to amend and with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gray v. Cnty. of L. A.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 18, 2022
2:21-cv-07685-DMG-AFM (C.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2022)
Case details for

Gray v. Cnty. of L. A.

Case Details

Full title:Kenneth Gray v. County of Los Angeles, et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jan 18, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-07685-DMG-AFM (C.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2022)