From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

GRAY v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Jonesboro Division
Dec 29, 2009
NO: 3:09CV00010 SWW (E.D. Ark. Dec. 29, 2009)

Opinion

NO: 3:09CV00010 SWW.

December 29, 2009


ORDER


Before the Court is Plaintiff's unopposed motion for an amended scheduling order. Plaintiff seeks a continuance of the trial date and an extension of all deadlines. As provided in the Court's final scheduling order, the parties may conduct discovery beyond the discovery deadline set forth in the final scheduling order; however, the Court will not be available to resolve discovery disputes that arise during the course of extended discovery. The Court will continue the trial date and set a new deadlines for dispositive motions.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's unopposed motion for an amended scheduling order is GRANTED as provided above.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

GRAY v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Jonesboro Division
Dec 29, 2009
NO: 3:09CV00010 SWW (E.D. Ark. Dec. 29, 2009)
Case details for

GRAY v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY

Case Details

Full title:VANESSA GRAY, as mother of deceased Briana Arford, and as guardian for…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Jonesboro Division

Date published: Dec 29, 2009

Citations

NO: 3:09CV00010 SWW (E.D. Ark. Dec. 29, 2009)