From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graves v. Warden, Ohio Reformatory for Women

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 17, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13cv886 (WOB-KLL) (S.D. Ohio Mar. 17, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13cv886 (WOB-KLL)

03-17-2014

DENISE GRAVES PETITIONER v. WARDEN, OHIO REFORMATORY FOR WOMEN RESPONDENT


JUDGMENT

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. #4), and having considered de novo those objections filed thereto by Petitioner (Doc. #6), and the Court having sufficiently considered the matter, and being advised,

IT IS ORDERED that the objections be, and they hereby are, overruled; that the Report and Recommendation be, and it hereby is, adopted as the finding of fact and conclusions of law of this Court; that the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. #1), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 be, and it hereby is, denied as time-barred, and this matter is hereby dismissed from the docket of this court. A certificate of appealability shall not issue with respect to any of the claims alleged herein. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), any appeal of this judgment would not be taken in good faith.

Signed By:

William O. Bertelsman

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Graves v. Warden, Ohio Reformatory for Women

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 17, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13cv886 (WOB-KLL) (S.D. Ohio Mar. 17, 2014)
Case details for

Graves v. Warden, Ohio Reformatory for Women

Case Details

Full title:DENISE GRAVES PETITIONER v. WARDEN, OHIO REFORMATORY FOR WOMEN RESPONDENT

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 17, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13cv886 (WOB-KLL) (S.D. Ohio Mar. 17, 2014)