From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grate v. Waccamaw EOC, Inc.

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Jun 12, 2013
Appellate Case No. 2012-209227 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 12, 2013)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2012-209227 Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-247

06-12-2013

Joseph N. Grate, Appellant, v. Waccamaw EOC, Inc., Respondent.

Joseph N. Grate, of Pawleys Island, pro se. Ralph J. Wilson, Sr., of Ralph J. Wilson, Attorney at Law, P.A., of Conway, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.


Appeal From Horry County

William H. Seals, Jr., Circuit Court Judge


AFFIRMED

Joseph N. Grate, of Pawleys Island, pro se.

Ralph J. Wilson, Sr., of Ralph J. Wilson, Attorney at Law, P.A., of Conway, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Ulmer v. Ulmer, 369 S.C. 486, 490, 632 S.E.2d 858, 861 (2006) ("An appellate court will not consider issues on appeal which have not been preserved for appellate review."); Peay v. Ross, 292 S.C. 535, 537, 357 S.E.2d 482, 484 (Ct. App. 1987) ("Since the insufficiency of the evidence was not properly raised at trial, [this court] cannot review the judgment on that ground."); Lites v. Taylor, 284 S.C. 316, 318, 326 S.E.2d 173, 175 (Ct. App. 1985) ("The failure of a [party] to move for a directed verdict at trial precludes a challenge on appeal to the sufficiency of the evidence."). AFFIRMED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

HUFF, WILLIAMS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Grate v. Waccamaw EOC, Inc.

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Jun 12, 2013
Appellate Case No. 2012-209227 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 12, 2013)
Case details for

Grate v. Waccamaw EOC, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Joseph N. Grate, Appellant, v. Waccamaw EOC, Inc., Respondent.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 12, 2013

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2012-209227 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 12, 2013)