To the extent that ESI urges the Court to consider what claims could have been raised, it declines to do so. "[A] claim is not barred by res judicata simply because it could have been raised in the first action if it does not otherwise meet the four identities required by the doctrine." Grasso v. Grasso, 2014 WL 6686329, at *3 (M.D. Fla. 2014). Here, the application of the rule against splitting causes of action would serve no purpose but to convenience the alleged wrongdoer.