From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grant v. T-Mobile U.S. Inc.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Apr 15, 2024
C23-1946 MJP (W.D. Wash. Apr. 15, 2024)

Opinion

C23-1946 MJP

04-15-2024

LAKISHA GRANT, Plaintiff, v. T-MOBILE USA, INC., Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND

MARSHA J. PECHMAN UNITED STATES SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE.

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Amend. (Dkt. No. 18.) Having reviewed the Motion, to which Defendant stipulates, and all relevant materials in the record, the Court GRANTS the Motion.

Plaintiff seeks leave to amend her complaint to include a “42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a), Title VII Retaliation claim against Defendant T-Mobile USA Inc. for involuntarily terminating the Plaintiff on March 20, 2024[.]” (Mot. at 1.) Under Rule 15(a), leave to amend should be liberally granted when justice so requires. Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a)(2). Here, T-Mobile has stipulated to the amendment, and it appear to relate to facts that arose after the filing of the initial complaint. The Court finds that leave to amend should is proper. Additionally, Plaintiff filed this request before the deadline to amend the pleadings expired. (See Case Scheduling Order (Dkt. No. 17).) As such, the Court GRANTS the Motion. Plaintiff must file her amended complaint within 7 days of entry of this order.

The clerk is ordered to provide copies of this order to all counsel.


Summaries of

Grant v. T-Mobile U.S. Inc.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Apr 15, 2024
C23-1946 MJP (W.D. Wash. Apr. 15, 2024)
Case details for

Grant v. T-Mobile U.S. Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LAKISHA GRANT, Plaintiff, v. T-MOBILE USA, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Apr 15, 2024

Citations

C23-1946 MJP (W.D. Wash. Apr. 15, 2024)