From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grant v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Dec 5, 1984
325 S.E.2d 179 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

69362.

DECIDED DECEMBER 5, 1984.

Forgery. DeKalb Superior Court. Before Judge Weeks.

Robert E. Wilson, District Attorney, Barbara B. Conroy, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.


Appellant was convicted of 11 counts of forgery in the first degree and sentenced to 10 years to serve 7 on each count. His attorney filed a motion to withdraw as counsel pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 ( 87 SC 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493) (1967). In accordance with Anders, counsel has filed a brief raising points of law which he considered could arguably support an appeal. We are in agreement with counsel that none of the points raised, though persuasively presented, has any merit. We have therefore granted the motion to withdraw. In addition, we have fully examined the record and transcript to determine independently if there are any meritorious errors of law. We have found none. We are satisfied that the evidence produced at trial was sufficient to authorize any rational trier of fact to find appellant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the crimes charged. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560) (1979); Baldwin v. State, 153 Ga. App. 35, 37 ( 264 S.E.2d 528) (1980).

Judgment affirmed. Banke, P. J., and Pope, J., concur.


DECIDED DECEMBER 5, 1984.


Summaries of

Grant v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Dec 5, 1984
325 S.E.2d 179 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Grant v. State

Case Details

Full title:GRANT v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Dec 5, 1984

Citations

325 S.E.2d 179 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)
172 Ga. App. 897