From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grant v. Rycoline Products, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 1, 1997
241 A.D.2d 308 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

July 1, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Sheila Abdus-Salaam, J.).


In light of the history and circumstances of this case, the IAS Court, in ordering production of redacted employee worker compensation records, did not abuse its discretion in this discovery matter and appropriately relied on the Referee's report, which is supported by the record. We have considered defendant-appellant's remaining arguments and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Ellerin, Andrias and Colabella, JJ.


Summaries of

Grant v. Rycoline Products, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 1, 1997
241 A.D.2d 308 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Grant v. Rycoline Products, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ANN GRANT, Respondent, v. RYCOLINE PRODUCTS, INC., et al., Defendants, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jul 1, 1997

Citations

241 A.D.2d 308 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
659 N.Y.S.2d 39