Opinion
June Term, 1902.
Judgment of County Court affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Hiscock, J., not voting, and Williams, J., who dissented upon the ground that there is no proof of defendant's negligence; no proof that grass was cut on the defendant's right of way before the fire and allowed to remain there and become dry; no proof that the fire caught in such dry grass, or was communicated thereby to the plaintiff's premises, and this is the only ground of negligence upon which it is claimed the judgment can be sustained.