From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grant v. Martinez

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 15, 2023
2:20-cv-01963-DJC-JDP (PS) (E.D. Cal. May. 15, 2023)

Opinion

2:20-cv-01963-DJC-JDP (PS)

05-15-2023

MARK A. GRANT, Plaintiff, v. LUIS MARTINEZ, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

HON. DANIEL J. CALABRETTA, DISTRICT JUDGE

On March 14, 2023, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.

The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The Magistrate Judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[Determinations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .””). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed March 14, 2023, are ADOPTED;

2. This action is dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders; and

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Grant v. Martinez

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 15, 2023
2:20-cv-01963-DJC-JDP (PS) (E.D. Cal. May. 15, 2023)
Case details for

Grant v. Martinez

Case Details

Full title:MARK A. GRANT, Plaintiff, v. LUIS MARTINEZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: May 15, 2023

Citations

2:20-cv-01963-DJC-JDP (PS) (E.D. Cal. May. 15, 2023)