From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grant v. Henderson-Pierce Motor Co.

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Mar 16, 1926
107 So. 724 (Ala. Crim. App. 1926)

Opinion

4 Div. 183.

March 16, 1926.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Pike County; W. L. Parks, Judge.

Claim suit between the Henderson-Pierce Motor Company and Mattie Kysar Grant. From a judgment for plaintiff, claimant appeals. Affirmed.

Ballard Brassell, of Troy, for appellant.

It is required that the appellate court review the record, without any presumption in favor of the court below. Code 1923, § 9498.

A. G. Seay, of Troy, for appellee.

Where a cause is tried without a jury, the finding of the count on facts given orally will have the effect of a jury verdict, and will not be disturbed, unless plainly wrong. Odom v. County Coal Co., 103 So. 42, 212 Ala. 374.


The trial was had before the judge without the intervention of a jury, and the evidence was taken ore tenus. Long after the adoption of Acts 1915, p. 824 (now incorporated in section 9498 of the Code of 1923), the Supreme Court and this court have held:

"When a civil case is tried by the court without a jury, the conclusion of the trial judge upon the finding of fact from the evidence given ore tenus has the effect of a verdict of a jury, and will not be set aside, unless that judgment is contrary to the great weight of the evidence; that is, plainly erroneous or manifestly wrong." Halle v. Brooks, 96 So. 341, 209 Ala. 486.

We would not be authorized to disturb the judgment appealed from.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Grant v. Henderson-Pierce Motor Co.

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Mar 16, 1926
107 So. 724 (Ala. Crim. App. 1926)
Case details for

Grant v. Henderson-Pierce Motor Co.

Case Details

Full title:GRANT v. HENDERSON-PIERCE MOTOR CO

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Mar 16, 1926

Citations

107 So. 724 (Ala. Crim. App. 1926)
21 Ala. App. 285

Citing Cases

Grayson v. George

Greene v. Williams, 92 Tenn. 220, 21 S.W. 520, 19 L.R.A. 478. The decree and findings of a trial court on…

Wiggins v. Wiggins

The finding of the probate court, based on the examination of witnesses ore tenus, is presumed to be correct,…