Opinion
No. 19-1999
06-29-2020
MARK T. GRANT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, Defendant - Appellee.
Mark T. Grant, Appellant Pro Se. David L. Collins, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY OF ROANOKE, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, District Judge. (7:16-cv-00007-MFU) Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark T. Grant, Appellant Pro Se. David L. Collins, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY OF ROANOKE, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Mark T. Grant appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Grant v. City of Roanoke, No. 7:16-cv-00007-MFU (W.D. Va. July 18, 2017; Nov. 7, 2017; and Mar. 19, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
The district court determined that Grant was entitled to reopening of his time to file an appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The City does not challenge this finding on appeal. Accordingly, we deny the City's motion to dismiss the appeal as untimely. --------
AFFIRMED