From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grant-Davis v. Fortune

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 21, 2016
645 F. App'x 288 (4th Cir. 2016)

Opinion

No. 15-2598

04-21-2016

KING GRANT-DAVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SHANE FORTUNE; SCOTT BLIEMEISTER; JEROME BURGESS; GREG LEY, of Wal-Mart, Charleston, South Carolina District; WAL-MART, Defendants - Appellees.

King Grant-Davis, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior District Judge. (2:15-cv-04211-PMD) Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. King Grant-Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

King Grant-Davis appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Grant-Davis v. Fortune, No. 2:15-cv-04211-PMD (D.S.C. Dec. 8, 2015). We decline to consider the arguments Grant-Davis raises for the first time on appeal. Muth v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Grant-Davis v. Fortune

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 21, 2016
645 F. App'x 288 (4th Cir. 2016)
Case details for

Grant-Davis v. Fortune

Case Details

Full title:KING GRANT-DAVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SHANE FORTUNE; SCOTT…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 21, 2016

Citations

645 F. App'x 288 (4th Cir. 2016)