From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Granger v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Apr 18, 2000
16 S.W.3d 724 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED76507.

April 18, 2000.

APPEAL FROM MISSOURI CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS; HON. DENNIS M. SCHAUMANN, JUDGE.

Douglas L. Levine, 111 Church Street, Suite 210, Ferguson, MO 63135, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John Munson Morris, III, Atty. Gen. Kristin Frazier, P.O. Box 899 Jefferson, City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before Reichard B. Teitelman, P.J., Clifford H. Ahrens and Lawrence E. Mooney, JJ



ORDER


Movant appeals from a judgment denying on the merits, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief.

The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(2).


Summaries of

Granger v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Apr 18, 2000
16 S.W.3d 724 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Granger v. State

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS GRANGER, MOVANT-APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Apr 18, 2000

Citations

16 S.W.3d 724 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)