From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Granger v. Craig

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 3, 1881
85 N.Y. 619 (N.Y. 1881)

Summary

In Granger v. Craig (85 N.Y. 619) it is said: "The Code, however, does not abridge the power that the Supreme Court has always had over its own judgments, to correct mistakes in them, to vacate them for irregularity, to stay proceedings on them for such time and on such terms as to the court seem proper."

Summary of this case from Mossein v. Empire State Surety Co.

Opinion

Argued April 19, 1881

Decided May 3, 1881

J.M. Dunning for appellant.

W.F. Cogswell for respondents.


Per Curiam opinion for dismissal of appeal.

All concur.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Granger v. Craig

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 3, 1881
85 N.Y. 619 (N.Y. 1881)

In Granger v. Craig (85 N.Y. 619) it is said: "The Code, however, does not abridge the power that the Supreme Court has always had over its own judgments, to correct mistakes in them, to vacate them for irregularity, to stay proceedings on them for such time and on such terms as to the court seem proper."

Summary of this case from Mossein v. Empire State Surety Co.
Case details for

Granger v. Craig

Case Details

Full title:LYMAN H. GRANGER, Appellant, v . HENRY H. CRAIG et al., Respondents

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 3, 1881

Citations

85 N.Y. 619 (N.Y. 1881)

Citing Cases

Wayne Iron Ore Co. v. Ontario M. Co., Inc.

Impending war has been held to be an insufficient ground ( Astor v. Romayne, 1 Johns. Ch. 310); also…

Typothetae v. Typographical Union No. 6

People ex rel. Forsyth v. Court of Sessions, 141 N.Y. 288; State v. Addy, 43 N.J.L. 113. Assuredly the…