From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graham v. Wal-Mart Assocs.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 9, 2024
5:23-cv-06566 NC (N.D. Cal. Feb. 9, 2024)

Opinion

5:23-cv-06566 NC

02-09-2024

BRIAN GRAHAM, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., Defendant.


ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL

DKT. NO. 9

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS, United States Magistrate Judge

The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that no issue remains for the Court's determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the case, provided that such motion is filed within 60 days. All scheduled dates are VACATED.

The Court retains jurisdiction over this case for 60 days. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Graham v. Wal-Mart Assocs.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 9, 2024
5:23-cv-06566 NC (N.D. Cal. Feb. 9, 2024)
Case details for

Graham v. Wal-Mart Assocs.

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN GRAHAM, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Feb 9, 2024

Citations

5:23-cv-06566 NC (N.D. Cal. Feb. 9, 2024)