From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graham v. United States

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Jun 15, 2021
Civ. 21-542 (MJD/LIB) (D. Minn. Jun. 15, 2021)

Opinion

Civ. 21-542 (MJD/LIB)

06-15-2021

William Charles Graham and Ronald Jermaine Jackson, Plaintiffs, v. United States of America, Defendant.


ORDER

Michael J. Davis United States District Judge

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois dated April 29, 2021. (Doc. No. 8). No. objections have been filed within the time allowed.

Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, and in consideration of the applicable law, the Court will adopt the Report and Recommendation in its entirety.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute;

2. Plaintiff Graham's application to proceed in forma pauperis, [Docket No. 2], is DENIED as moot; and

3. Plaintiff Jackson's application to procced in forma pauperis, [Docket No. 4], is DENIED as moot.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Graham v. United States

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Jun 15, 2021
Civ. 21-542 (MJD/LIB) (D. Minn. Jun. 15, 2021)
Case details for

Graham v. United States

Case Details

Full title:William Charles Graham and Ronald Jermaine Jackson, Plaintiffs, v. United…

Court:United States District Court, District of Minnesota

Date published: Jun 15, 2021

Citations

Civ. 21-542 (MJD/LIB) (D. Minn. Jun. 15, 2021)