From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graham v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
May 31, 2016
490 S.W.3d 777 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

WD 78934

05-31-2016

Adrian Graham, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Mark A. Grothoff, Assistant Public Defender Columbia, MO, Attorney for Appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, Christine Lesicko, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.


Mark A. Grothoff, Assistant Public Defender Columbia, MO, Attorney for Appellant.

Chris Koster, Attorney General, Christine Lesicko, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.

Before Division Two: Victor C. Howard, Presiding Judge, and Thomas H. Newton and Karen King Mitchell, Judges

Order

Per Curiam:

Adrian Graham appeals the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Graham argues that the motion court erred in failing to grant him an evidentiary hearing on his claim that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance in failing to investigate and call witnesses on Graham's behalf at trial. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Graham v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
May 31, 2016
490 S.W.3d 777 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Graham v. State

Case Details

Full title:Adrian Graham, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: May 31, 2016

Citations

490 S.W.3d 777 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016)