From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graham v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 23, 1968
214 So. 2d 72 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

Opinion

No. 1679.

September 23, 1968.

Appeal from the Criminal Court of Record for Palm Beach County, Cecil Rosier, J.

Moses Graham, in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Appellant was represented by his retained counsel at trial upon an Information charging him with murder in the second degree of one Sam Newman and an aggravated assault on one Daniel Newman.

After denial of a motion for a new trial and adjudication of guilt and sentence, the defendant has prosecuted this, his pro se appeal. He refused the offer of the trial court to appoint counsel to assist him in this appeal. The evidence clearly shows that the appellant shot both the Newmans with a pistol which he attempted to justify as self-defense to a jury at trial. The jury appears to have been properly instructed on the issues of fact submitted for its determination and applicable law, and the evidence supports the verdict finding the defendant guilty on each count. The matters assigned as error of the trial court are without merit. The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

McCAIN and REED, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Graham v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 23, 1968
214 So. 2d 72 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)
Case details for

Graham v. State

Case Details

Full title:MOSES GRAHAM, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Sep 23, 1968

Citations

214 So. 2d 72 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)