Opinion
No. 10-7683.
Submitted: May 19, 2011.
Decided: May 23, 2011.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (3:09-cv-01535-RMG).
Steven Anthony Graham, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Steven Anthony Graham appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his civil complaint, in which he alleged that the Defendants violated 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 (2006) and violated his First, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Graham v. Rosario, No. 3:09-cv-01535-RMG, 2010 WL 4687641 (D.S.C. filed Nov. 9, 2010 entered Nov. 10, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
As correctly noted by the magistrate judge, these claims are more properly considered under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971).
AFFIRMED.