From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graham v. Microsoft Corp.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 14, 2024
2:23-cv-05995-FMO-JPR (C.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-cv-05995-FMO-JPR

03-14-2024

KARMEL GRAHAM Plaintiffs, v. MICROSOFT CORP., et al. Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Fernando M. Olguin United States District Judge.

Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within 30, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Failure to re-open or seek an extension of time to re-open the action by the deadline set forth above shall be deemed as consent by the parties to dismissal of the action without prejudice. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962).


Summaries of

Graham v. Microsoft Corp.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 14, 2024
2:23-cv-05995-FMO-JPR (C.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2024)
Case details for

Graham v. Microsoft Corp.

Case Details

Full title:KARMEL GRAHAM Plaintiffs, v. MICROSOFT CORP., et al. Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Mar 14, 2024

Citations

2:23-cv-05995-FMO-JPR (C.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2024)