From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graham v. Foster

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Feb 5, 2016
SC: 152058 (Mich. Feb. 5, 2016)

Opinion

SC: 152058

02-05-2016

SHAE KEVIN GRAHAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SHAREA FOSTER, Defendant-Appellant.


Order

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, Justices COA: 318487
Oakland CC: 2013-808521-DP

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 16, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1). The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing whether the Court of Appeals correctly held that a necessary-party defendant may be brought into a lawsuit after the expiration of the limitations period based on the relation-back doctrine. See Casserly v Wayne Circuit Judge, 124 Mich 157, 161 (1900), Prather Engineering Co v Detroit, F & S Ry Co, 152 Mich 582, 585 (1908); but see Miller v Chapman Contracting, 477 Mich 102, 105 (2007) ("the relation-back doctrine does not extend to the addition of new parties"). The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 5, 2016

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Graham v. Foster

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Feb 5, 2016
SC: 152058 (Mich. Feb. 5, 2016)
Case details for

Graham v. Foster

Case Details

Full title:SHAE KEVIN GRAHAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SHAREA FOSTER…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Feb 5, 2016

Citations

SC: 152058 (Mich. Feb. 5, 2016)