From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graham v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Apr 7, 2011
373 P.3d 918 (Nev. 2011)

Opinion

No. 57989.

04-07-2011

Robert B. GRAHAM, Sr.; and Elizabeth Graham, Petitioners, v. The EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF the STATE of Nevada, In and for The COUNTY OF CLARK; and The Honorable Kathy A. Hardcastle, District Judge, Respondents, and A–Cab Company, a Nevada Corporation, Real Party In Interest.

Stovall & Associates Rogers, Mastrangelo, Carvalho & Mitchell, Ltd.


Stovall & Associates

Rogers, Mastrangelo, Carvalho & Mitchell, Ltd.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

This original petition for a writ of mandamus seeks to remove the underlying district court action from the Short Trial Program. Having reviewed the petition and its exhibits, we are not persuaded that this court's intervention by way of extraordinary relief is warranted at this time, as petitioners may raise this issue in any appeal from the final judgment and thus have an adequate legal remedy. NRAP 21(b)(1) ; NRS 34.170 ; Consolidated Generator v. Cummins Engine, 114 Nev. 1304, 1312, 971 P.2d 1251, 1256 (1998) ; Smith v. District Court, 107 Nev. 674, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 853 (1991). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.


Summaries of

Graham v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Apr 7, 2011
373 P.3d 918 (Nev. 2011)
Case details for

Graham v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.

Case Details

Full title:Robert B. GRAHAM, Sr.; and Elizabeth Graham, Petitioners, v. The EIGHTH…

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: Apr 7, 2011

Citations

373 P.3d 918 (Nev. 2011)