From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graham v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga
Aug 31, 2009
Case No. 1:08-cv-194 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 31, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 1:08-cv-194.

August 31, 2009


ORDER


United States Magistrate William B. Carter filed his Report and Recommendation [Court Doc. 20] pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Neither party filed objections within the given 10 days.

After reviewing the record, the Court agrees with Magistrate Judge Carter's report and recommendation. Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Carter's findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations pursuant to § 636(b)(1) and Rule 72(b). Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Court Doc. 13] is GRANTED. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Court Doc. 18] is DENIED. The Commissioner's denial of benefits is REVERSED under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and the instant action is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further administrative consideration of new and material evidence under Sentence Six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

The Clerk shall close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Graham v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga
Aug 31, 2009
Case No. 1:08-cv-194 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 31, 2009)
Case details for

Graham v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:RENEE C. GRAHAM, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga

Date published: Aug 31, 2009

Citations

Case No. 1:08-cv-194 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 31, 2009)