From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graham Nat. Bank v. Fifth Court of Appeals

Supreme Court of Texas
Feb 24, 1988
747 S.W.2d 370 (Tex. 1988)

Opinion

No. C-6865.

December 9, 1987. Rehearing Denied February 24, 1988.

Frank Jennings and R. Stephen Moore, Jennings, Dies Turner, Graham, for relator.

Samuel L. Boyd and Priscilla E. Perry, Boyd Fults, Dallas, for respondents.

ORDER


Be it remembered that relator's petition for writ of mandamus was submitted to the Supreme Court of Texas on the eighteenth day of November, 1987, and it is the opinion of the court that relator is entitled to relief.

The trial court's order of July 31, 1986 is declared void because that court's plenary power over the cause had expired. The trial judge attempted to vacate this order; however, the court of appeals ordered it reinstated. The court of appeals' order conflicts with TEX.R.CIV.P. 329b(f).

Therefore, without oral argument and pursuant to TEX.R.APP.P. 122, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is conditionally granted as follows:

(1) The Fifth Court of Appeals is hereby ordered to vacate its writ of mandamus order of October 31, 1986 in Cause No. 05-86-01039-CV; and

(2) The Honorable John M. Marshall, Judge, 14th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, is hereby directed to vacate his order of November 4, 1986 and to reinstate his order of September 5, 1986 in Cause No. 85-14443-A.

The writ will issue only if respondents fail to comply with this order.


Summaries of

Graham Nat. Bank v. Fifth Court of Appeals

Supreme Court of Texas
Feb 24, 1988
747 S.W.2d 370 (Tex. 1988)
Case details for

Graham Nat. Bank v. Fifth Court of Appeals

Case Details

Full title:The GRAHAM NATIONAL BANK, Relator, v. The FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court of Texas

Date published: Feb 24, 1988

Citations

747 S.W.2d 370 (Tex. 1988)

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. Latty v. Owens

Once a trial court loses plenary power over its judgment, the judgment becomes final and any attempt to…

Scott v. Twelfth Court of Appeals

We have frequently held that a court of appeals abused its discretion in issuing mandamus. Ginsberg v. Fifth…