From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graham Cos. v. Park

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Jul 22, 2020
306 So. 3d 978 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. 3D19-1280

07-22-2020

The GRAHAM COMPANIES, INC., etc., Appellant, v. Shick PARK, et al., Appellees.

Katz Barron, and Keith T. Grumer (Fort Lauderdale), for appellant. McKenna, McCausland & Murphy, P.A., and Robert Bruce McCausland (Fort Lauderdale), for appellees Shick Park and Melissa Park.


Katz Barron, and Keith T. Grumer (Fort Lauderdale), for appellant.

McKenna, McCausland & Murphy, P.A., and Robert Bruce McCausland (Fort Lauderdale), for appellees Shick Park and Melissa Park.

Before EMAS, C.J., and LOGUE and MILLER, JJ.

LOGUE, J.

Because a trial court's grant of a motion for involuntary dismissal at a bench trial should be upheld "when there is no reasonable evidence upon which a jury could legally predicate a verdict in favor of the non-moving party," Tylinski v. Klein Auto., Inc., 90 So. 3d 870, 873 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012), the trial court here did not err in involuntarily dismissing the counts against the guarantors of the lease. The letters addressed to the tenant demanded that the tenant perform. They were not evidence of a demand on the guarantors, even though the letters were sent to an address shared with the guarantors.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Graham Cos. v. Park

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Jul 22, 2020
306 So. 3d 978 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Graham Cos. v. Park

Case Details

Full title:The Graham Companies, Inc., etc., Appellant, v. Shick Park, et al.…

Court:Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Date published: Jul 22, 2020

Citations

306 So. 3d 978 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)