From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graddy v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Oct 23, 2012
No. 4:12-cv-299-DPM (E.D. Ark. Oct. 23, 2012)

Opinion

No. 4:12-cv-299-DPM

10-23-2012

KATHERINE SUE GRADDY PLAINTIFF v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

Graddy has filed various post-judgment motions. Document No. 17. Most are based on the Court's decision not to enjoin the Arkansas Securities Department's state-court fraud action against Lendell Earl Hillhouse, Sr. and Nick Lynn Technologies, Inc. As the Court explained in its 7 September 2012 memorandum opinion and order, Graddy has no standing to pursue those claims. They would fail in any event. The federal statute Graddy relies upon for preemption provides that "the securities commission (or any agency or office performing like functions) of any State shall retain jurisdiction under the laws of such State to investigate and bring enforcement actions . . . with respect to fraud or deceit[.]" 15 U.S.C. § 77r(c)(1)(A)(i). None of Graddy's other requests has merit. Post-judgment motions, Document No. 17, denied.

So Ordered.

_______________

D.P. Marshall Jr.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Graddy v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Oct 23, 2012
No. 4:12-cv-299-DPM (E.D. Ark. Oct. 23, 2012)
Case details for

Graddy v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.

Case Details

Full title:KATHERINE SUE GRADDY PLAINTIFF v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 23, 2012

Citations

No. 4:12-cv-299-DPM (E.D. Ark. Oct. 23, 2012)