From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graddy v. Knipp

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 16, 2013
No. 2: 13-cv-1465 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2: 13-cv-1465 JAM KJN P

12-16-2013

TRENT GRADDY, SR., Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM KNIPP, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed November 4, 2013, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

_______________________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
gr1465.fta


Summaries of

Graddy v. Knipp

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 16, 2013
No. 2: 13-cv-1465 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 2013)
Case details for

Graddy v. Knipp

Case Details

Full title:TRENT GRADDY, SR., Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM KNIPP, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 16, 2013

Citations

No. 2: 13-cv-1465 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 2013)