From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graciano v. Matouck Textile Works, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 13, 2021
21-CV-6727 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 13, 2021)

Opinion

21-CV-6727 (RA)

09-13-2021

SANDY GRACIANO, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. MATOUCK TEXTILE WORKS, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

RONNIE ABRAMS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

It has been reported to the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in this case. Accordingly, it is hereby:

ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's docket if the application to restore the action is made within forty-five (45) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within forty-five (45) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court within the same thirty-day period. See Hendrickson v. United States, 791 F.3d 354, 358 (2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Graciano v. Matouck Textile Works, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 13, 2021
21-CV-6727 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 13, 2021)
Case details for

Graciano v. Matouck Textile Works, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SANDY GRACIANO, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 13, 2021

Citations

21-CV-6727 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 13, 2021)