From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gowder v. Loggins

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 31, 1940
9 S.E.2d 200 (Ga. Ct. App. 1940)

Opinion

28375.

DECIDED MAY 31, 1940.

Certiorari; from Hall superior court — Judge Candler. January 29, 1940.

H. T. Oliver, for plaintiffs in error.

Charles J. Thurmond, contra.


1. In a suit in a justice's court on a summons, to which the account sued on is attached, as follows: "In re: Digging Tunnel Merk Mica Mine. Balance due to date $54.90" it was not necessary that the copy of the account show whether it was based on an express written or parol contract or on an implied contract to pay for extra labor and materials not provided for in an express contract. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Drake, 21 Ga. App. 81 ( 94 S.E. 65); Wright v. Pearson, 48 Ga. App. 207 ( 172 S.E. 590).

2. A demurrer to a suit on open account on the ground that no itemized statement is attached is a special demurrer, and can not be filed or entertained after the first term.

3. The evidence authorized the verdict. The court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed. Stephens, P. J., and Sutton, J., concur.

DECIDED MAY 31, 1940.


Summaries of

Gowder v. Loggins

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 31, 1940
9 S.E.2d 200 (Ga. Ct. App. 1940)
Case details for

Gowder v. Loggins

Case Details

Full title:GOWDER et al. v. LOGGINS

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: May 31, 1940

Citations

9 S.E.2d 200 (Ga. Ct. App. 1940)
9 S.E.2d 200