Opinion
August 22, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (LeVine, J.).
Ordered that the appeal from the order dated May 5, 1993, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order dated June 21, 1993, made upon reargument; and it is further,
Ordered that the order dated June 21, 1993, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,
Ordered that the defendant is awarded one bill of costs.
The plaintiff husband contends that he has insufficient funds to meet his maintenance and child support obligations or to pay for the defendant wife's interim attorney's fees. The appropriate remedy to resolve any inequity in the Supreme Court's pendente lite award is a speedy trial, particularly here where there is conflicting evidence as to the husband's financial situation (see, Frankel v. Frankel, 150 A.D.2d 520; Kurppe v. Kurppe, 147 A.D.2d 533; Berger v. Berger, 125 A.D.2d 285).
We reject the husband's contention that the Supreme Court erroneously denied his request to compel the wife to undergo a psychiatric examination. Finally, the husband's contention that the order affording him temporary supervised visitation was flawed because it failed to provide for supervised visitation at a neutral site, with a neutral supervisor, is not before this Court, since that issue was not raised in the Supreme Court. Bracken, J.P., Sullivan, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.