From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gould v. United States

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California
Mar 16, 2004
C03-1322 CRB (N.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2004)

Opinion

          DENNIS P. FITZSIMONS, ESQ. BOORNAZIAN, JENSEN & GARTHE Oakland, CA, Attorney for Defendant. The United States of America.

          SEQUOIA LAW GROUP JUDITH ALEX, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiff DAVID J. GOULD.

          BOORNAZIAN, JENSEN & GARTHE DENNIS F. FITZSIMONS, ESQ. Attorney for Defendant/Cross-Complainants. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

          LONG BLUMBERG THOMAS E. BRINLEY, ESQ. Attorney for Third-Party Defendant. INTEL CORPORATION.


          STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

          CHARLES BREYER, District Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule Civil Procedure 41(a)(1).

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gould v. United States

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California
Mar 16, 2004
C03-1322 CRB (N.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2004)
Case details for

Gould v. United States

Case Details

Full title:DAVID J. GOULD, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. AND…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California

Date published: Mar 16, 2004

Citations

C03-1322 CRB (N.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2004)