From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gottesfeld v. Anderson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 9, 2020
18 CIVIL 10836 (PGG) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 9, 2020)

Opinion

18 CIVIL 10836 (PGG)

03-09-2020

MARTIN S. GOTTESFELD, Plaintiff, v. ACTING DEPUTY DIRECTOR DAVID ANDERSON, WARDEN ESKER L. TATUM, MEDICAL DIRECTOR ANTHONY BUSSONICH, and ACTING DIRECTOR HUGH J. HURWITZ, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated March 6, 2020, Defendants' motion is granted, and Plaintiff's claims are dismissed. Any pending motions are denied as moot. This Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

March 9, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Gottesfeld v. Anderson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 9, 2020
18 CIVIL 10836 (PGG) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 9, 2020)
Case details for

Gottesfeld v. Anderson

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN S. GOTTESFELD, Plaintiff, v. ACTING DEPUTY DIRECTOR DAVID ANDERSON…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Mar 9, 2020

Citations

18 CIVIL 10836 (PGG) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 9, 2020)