From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gotham Boxing v. Finkel

Supreme Court of the State of New York. New York County
Jan 8, 2008
18 Misc. 3d 1114 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2008)

Summary

discussing First Department jurisprudence on breach of contract and fraud claims

Summary of this case from Decatur v. 10500 Drummond Rd. Partners LP

Opinion

January 8, 2008.


Fraud — Factual Misrepresentation. Contracts — Illegal Contracts — Prize Fighting.


Summaries of

Gotham Boxing v. Finkel

Supreme Court of the State of New York. New York County
Jan 8, 2008
18 Misc. 3d 1114 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2008)

discussing First Department jurisprudence on breach of contract and fraud claims

Summary of this case from Decatur v. 10500 Drummond Rd. Partners LP

In Gotham Boxing, supra, the Court found that the plaintiffs had alleged reasonable reliance, notwithstanding the absence of an enforceable agreement, on the grounds that it was customary for promoters to act in reliance on an oral agreement containing the material terms setting up a fight, and contracts are typically approved by the New York State Athletic Commission at the time of a weigh-in immediately precedent a fight.

Summary of this case from Meadow Ridge Capital v. Levi

distinguishing caselaw

Summary of this case from Purchase Partners II, LLC v. Max Capital Mgt. Corp.
Case details for

Gotham Boxing v. Finkel

Case Details

Full title:Gotham Boxing Inc. v. Finkel

Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York. New York County

Date published: Jan 8, 2008

Citations

18 Misc. 3d 1114 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 50020

Citing Cases

Tracey v. Bright City Dev., LLC

The Seller's fraud claim against the Developer is not duplicative of his breach of contract claim, nor is it…

Stryker Sec. Grp., Inc. v. Elite Investigations Ltd.

Therefore, in light of this Court's finding that dismissal of the fraud and fraudulent inducement…