From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gormly v. Comm'n for Lawyer Discipline

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Aug 21, 2019
No. 05-19-00675-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 21, 2019)

Opinion

No. 05-19-00675-CV

08-21-2019

ERIC K. GORMLY, Appellant v. COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE/STATE BAR OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-03533

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Whitehill, and Justice Molberg
Opinion by Chief Justice Burns

Eric K. Gormly appeals the trial court's December 21, 2018 judgment. According to his notice of appeal, appellant "timely filed a motion for new trial." Assuming this statement is correct, appellant's notice of appeal was due on or before March 21, 2019. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a). However, appellant's notice of appeal was filed in the trial court on June 3, 2019, outside the ninety-day period provided by rule 26.1. See Blaylock v. Fiesta Mart, Inc., No. 05-04-01784-CV, 2005 WL 110375, *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Jan. 20, 2005) (although motion for new trial timely filed, notice of appeal was untimely and deprived Court of jurisdiction). Thus, the appeal appears to be untimely.

In order to determine our jurisdiction, we directed the district clerk to file the clerk's record. In response, the district clerk filed a letter stating that the clerk's record had been prepared but not filed because appellant had not paid or made arrangements to pay for the clerk's record. We then notified appellant by letter dated June 13, 2019 that the clerk's record had not been filed. We instructed him to provide written verification by June 24, 2019 that he had paid or made arrangements to pay for the clerk's record or that he had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that if he failed to respond with the required documentation, the Court might dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b). To date, appellant has not responded or otherwise communicated with the Court about his appeal.

For the above reasons, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a); 37.3(b); 42.3.

/Robert D. Burns, III/

ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE 190675F.P05

JUDGMENT

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-03533.
Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns, Justices Whitehill and Molberg participating.

In accordance with this Court's opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. Judgment entered August 21, 2019


Summaries of

Gormly v. Comm'n for Lawyer Discipline

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Aug 21, 2019
No. 05-19-00675-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 21, 2019)
Case details for

Gormly v. Comm'n for Lawyer Discipline

Case Details

Full title:ERIC K. GORMLY, Appellant v. COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE/STATE BAR OF…

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Aug 21, 2019

Citations

No. 05-19-00675-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 21, 2019)