From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gorman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 13, 1994
636 So. 2d 203 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 92-2700.

May 13, 1994.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County; N. Russell Bower, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Abel Gomez, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Gypsy Bailey, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


Appellant raises two points on appeal: 1) Whether the trial court erred in allowing three state witnesses to testify to hearsay statements made by the child victim, and 2) whether the trial court had jurisdiction to resentence the appellant and enter an amended sentencing order after appellant had filed an appeal. We find no merit as to issue I, and affirm without further discussion.

As to issue II, while it appears that the original sentence was illegal, the trial court lacked jurisdiction to amend the sentence after the notice of appeal was filed in this court. Kelly v. State, 359 So.2d 493 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). In the interest of judicial economy, we affirm the judgment, but remand for imposition of the sentence in accordance with the penalty for violation of section 775.082(1), Florida Statutes (1991).

BARFIELD and BENTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gorman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 13, 1994
636 So. 2d 203 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Gorman v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH GORMAN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: May 13, 1994

Citations

636 So. 2d 203 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Citing Cases

State v. Morales

In my view the defendant was correct in saying that the trial court did not have jurisdiction because the…