From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gorgol v. Minnesota

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Mar 23, 2017
Civil No. 17-40 (DWF/TNL) (D. Minn. Mar. 23, 2017)

Opinion

Civil No. 17-40 (DWF/TNL)

03-23-2017

Charles Edward Gorgol, Petitioner, v. State of Minnesota, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung dated February 14, 2017. (Doc. No. 6.) No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. The factual background for the above-entitled matter is clearly and precisely set forth in the Report and Recommendation and is incorporated by reference. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and upon all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court now makes and enters the following:

ORDER

1. Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung's February 14, 2017 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. [6]) is ADOPTED.

2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus of petitioner Charles Edward Gorgol (Doc. No. [1]) is SUMMARILY DENIED.

3. This action is DISMISSED.

4. No certificate of appealability will be issued.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: March 23, 2017

s/Donovan W. Frank

DONOVAN W. FRANK

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Gorgol v. Minnesota

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Mar 23, 2017
Civil No. 17-40 (DWF/TNL) (D. Minn. Mar. 23, 2017)
Case details for

Gorgol v. Minnesota

Case Details

Full title:Charles Edward Gorgol, Petitioner, v. State of Minnesota, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Mar 23, 2017

Citations

Civil No. 17-40 (DWF/TNL) (D. Minn. Mar. 23, 2017)