Opinion
CASE NO.: SC13-266 Lower Tribunal No.: 88-607 Lower Tribunal No.: F90-1145
03-11-2013
MARSHALL LEE GORE Petitioner(s) v. RICK SCOTT, ET AL. Respondent(s)
To the extent that petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition, the petition is hereby denied. See Sutton v. State, 975 So. 2d 1073, 1076 (Fla. 2008); English v. McCrary, 348 So. 2d 293, 296 (Fla. 1977). To the extent that petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus, petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to the relief requested. Accordingly, he is not entitled to mandamus relief. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000). POLSTON, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur. A True Copy
Test:
__________
Thomas D. Hall
Clerk, Supreme Court
th
Served:
HON. ROBERT LOUIS JARVIS, JR.
BAYA HARRISON, III
MARSHALL LEE GORE
SARAH J. RUMPH
CAROLYN M. SNURKOWSKI
HON. LEANDRA G. JOHNSON